When the Threat Is Sacred: Understanding Crocodile Risk in Timor-Leste

By María Morena Vicente and Emiliano Rodríguez Nuesch

When people think about danger in coastal communities, they imagine tsunamis or storms. But in Timor-Leste, researchers found something different: the risk people face most often is crocodile attacks. Since 2007, the country has recorded at least 173 attacks, 78 of them fatal — and experts believe the real number is higher because many cases are never reported.

The challenge is not just biological. It is cultural.

Across Timor-Leste, crocodiles are not seen as pests or predators. They are sacred beings, tied to creation stories and ancestral belief systems. In many communities, crocodiles are treated as protectors — even family. Killing one is taboo.

That makes risk communication complicated.
How do you warn people about a danger they believe is part of who they are?

A Rising Risk — and a Growing Silence

Multiple studies confirm the scale of the problem. A 2024 Oryx paper documented a 23-fold increase in reported attacks over seven years. Reports from the IUCN Crocodile Specialist Group show that in south-coast villages, one in three recorded attacks are fatal.

Yet communities rarely retaliate. In some cases, they don’t even report attacks.

Why?

Researchers highlight a key barrier: belief systems anchored in lulik, the sacred order that governs respect, taboos, and relationships between humans and the natural world. Within this worldview:

  • Crocodiles can be ancestors.

  • Attacks may be interpreted as spiritual punishment.

  • Killing a crocodile can bring misfortune to the entire community.

This creates a psychological bind: the threat is real, but confronting it violates something deeper.

When Reverence Meets Risk

For scientists and conservationists, this presents a unique challenge. Crocodiles must be protected — they are a vulnerable species — yet people must be protected too. Timorese leaders, researchers, and the IUCN now advocate for culturally conscious risk reduction, including:

  • Community-led monitoring instead of lethal control

  • Education that aligns with traditional beliefs

  • Mapping hotspots where attacks are most likely

  • Infrastructure changes (safe crossings, barriers, warning systems)

These strategies work better because they respect the core truth: for many Timorese, crocodiles are not “animals,” they are relatives.

The Psychological Barrier: When the Threat Has a Name

In this blog, we often write about psychological barriers that shape our response to risk — psychic numbing, the prominence effect, emotional distance. In Timor-Leste, the barrier is different: moral closeness.

When a threat is sacred, the mind resists framing it as danger.
People hesitate to act, hesitate to speak, hesitate to warn.

The result is predictable: underreporting, preventable deaths, and limited public conversation.

This is not just a conservation problem. It is a human behavior problem — and a reminder that risk communication must match the cultural reality of the communities we expect to respond.

To some, the island of Timor itself resembles a saltwater crocodile, with the eastern part resembling the head and the western part resembling the tail. Photo courtesy: NASA.